In this class, we are going to discuss some commercial speech issues, specifically focusing on where trademark law and the First Amendment come into contact with each other.
Reading:
- First Amendment Limitations on Trademark Rights
- Government Regulation Gets the Finger from a Feisty Frog
- Vanna White v. Samsung Electronics
- Dissent by Kozinski
- Bad Frog Brewery, Inc. v. New York State Liquor Authority, 134 F.3d 87 (2d Cir. 1998)
- Smith v. Wal-Mart Stores, Inc., 537 F. Supp. 2d 1302 (N.D. Ga. 2008)
- Freecycle Network, Inc. v. Oey , 505 F.3d 898 (9th Cir. 2007) (you have already read this for an earlier class).
- BidZirk, LLC v. Smith, 35 Media L. Rep. 2478 (D.S.C. 2007).
- Burnett v. Twentieth Century Fox Film Corp., 491 F. Supp. 2d 962 (C.D. Cal. 2007). (focus on the trademark discussion)
Click Here to Subscribe
November 12, 2008 at 7:49 pm |
With repsect to PARODY and TRADEMARK DILUTION by TARNISHMENT, I submit the following youtube link. I stumbled upon this site while considering, and performing extensive research, on the BURNETT v. TWENTIETH CENTURY FOX FILM CORP case and our class readings. The link contains sensitive material and I would advise most students to refrain from watching the video.
I am curious to know, however, whether in this scenario a Dilution by Tarnishment claim could be successful. Thank you in anticipation of your opinion and comments.
Similarly, I would like to review family-marks, TTAB procedures, and other details from our syllabus, if permitted by class time.
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=vo7Sng5Jeb0
FL
November 13, 2008 at 6:50 pm |
This is an EU trademark decision regarding Lego and an alleged infringer, competitor Mega Brands. The EU essentially said that the trademark for Lego is functional. I think this is a good decision, and I agree that the Lego is essentially functional. It is necessary to deny protection to Lego because it would essentially grant a monopoly on the functional shape of the Lego.
http://www.independent.co.uk/news/world/europe/judges-knock-down-legos-trademark-case-1015830.html
Lauren Herold
November 18, 2008 at 8:38 pm |
Intel, like Apple, seems to be stepping up the policing of their mark. They have filed 15 suits this year- most seem unlikely to succeed.
http://www.techdirt.com/articles/20081108/1826182774.shtml
Lauren Herold